logo


Nate Smith, 'Miracle' Hockey Shot Boy, Gets No Money

Nate Smith Hockey Shot

First Posted: 09/01/11 10:32 AM ET Updated: 11/01/11 06:12 AM ET

JEFF BAENEN, Associated Press

MINNEAPOLS -- It was an amazing hockey shot, with the puck sliding into a tiny hole from center ice for a $50,000 prize. But a penalty was called on the Minnesota boy who made the shot during a charity event because his twin brother should have been wielding the stick.

The company that insured the event, Odds On Promotions of Reno, Nev., said Wednesday that due to "contractual breaches and legal implications" it was unable to pay the claim. Instead, the company said it would donate $20,000 to youth hockey in Minnesota in the boys' names.

With one shot, 11-year-old Nate Smith hit the puck through a hole cut into a board from 89 feet away during a charity hockey game at Shattuck-St. Mary's School in the southern Minnesota city of Faribault on Aug. 11. But it was Nate's identical twin, Nick, whose raffle ticket won the chance to take the shot at a hole just slightly larger than the puck.

The boys' father, Pat Smith of Owatonna, said Nick was going outside with his buddies and told his brother to try.

"It didn't even dawn on me he (Nate) was going to make it," Smith told The Associated Press Wednesday.

He told organizers the next day about his sons' swap. "You could tell they weren't feeling right about it," Smith said of the boys.

"We weren't trying to hide anything," he added. "We just felt honesty was the best policy."

Originally, Smith said he was going to write Nate's name on the raffle ticket before the drawing. But Nate begged off because he had just had a cast removed, his father said.

"We greatly respect the eventual honesty of the Smith family," Mark Gilmartin, president of Odds On Promotions, said in a news release. "Although we're unable to pay the claim on Nate's incredible shot, we are confident our donation will foster a positive environment for present and future youth hockey in Minnesota."

Smith said the boys, who are entering sixth grade, are disappointed they won't get the money but are excited that youth hockey will benefit.

"They understand," Smith said.

Nick and Nate Smith play for the Owatonna Youth Hockey Association. Odds On Promotions said the $20,000 donation will benefit that organization as well as the Faribault Youth Hockey Association, the promotion's original beneficiary.

RELATED VIDEO:


 
  • Comments
  • 46
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
04:02 PM on 09/06/2011
I think Odds On did the right thing! $20K donation is very generous... especially considering the father didn't fess up until after the fact! Faribault has a great article about the whole situation here: http://bit.ly/qxTNZE
06:23 PM on 09/03/2011
Seems unfair not to pay on such a lame technicality.
12:19 PM on 09/02/2011
Wow, honesty and integrity. These boys will never make it politics, Wall Street, or the banking industry.
10:48 AM on 09/02/2011
Can't believe the comments and views of some of these people. One guy says the father was cheating before he turned honest...others are ridiculing the father for being honest. Quite frankly, they all make me sick! The father did the right thing, which counts for little in today's world where noone seems to have any honor, morals or ethics. The cheapskate insurance company should have paid the prize money.
10:25 AM on 09/02/2011
I can't believe how many thought dad was right in allowing his sons to break the rules, then wrong in admitting the infraction because money was involved. I am considering the forum here (liberals) and fully expected the corrupt responses, but still am sorely disappointed anyhow. If this licentiousness ever becomes the majority attitude, we are doomes. Dad you did the right thing when you admitted the cheating.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Garspies
When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro.
10:51 AM on 09/02/2011
You seem to want to equate honesty with party affiliation. Please name one republican politician who hasn't lied.
And please don't answer my question with a question.
photo
rafaelrobyns
micro-biotic
08:49 PM on 09/03/2011
You think liberals are decrying the fact that he was honest and lost the money? I'm not sure what planet you are from, but liberals are supposed to be the politically-correct, morally oversensitive crowd that doesn't care about money. As for allowing his sons to "break the rules," the odds made this decision one of giving one of his sons the thrill of going out on the ice, not the thrill of winning $50,000 dollars. "Breaking the rules" is convenient in hindsight but hardly applies to the situation at the time the decision was made.
09:26 AM on 09/02/2011
why donate the entire $50k instead of $20k?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
forestnfama
A Jimi Hendrix Woodstock Veteran
05:55 AM on 09/02/2011
In this case the father was stupid......sorry but self righteousness trumped rightness......in my humble opinion and probably in his now.....50,000 would have gone a long ways for education.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
forestnfama
A Jimi Hendrix Woodstock Veteran
05:40 AM on 09/02/2011
Stupidity trumps Honesty.......
05:11 AM on 09/02/2011
This family believes that honor and integrity are worth more than $50,000. It's inspiring. Well done, Dad. You just taught your boys one of the most valuable lessons they will ever learn. That's a real investment, and it will pay off.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Shadhili2003
Lead, follow, or get out of the way.
03:31 AM on 09/02/2011
I love seeing adults rob children, it shows how great humans can be. I never realized a raffle ticket now comes with a 48 page legal contract.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
maybesomeday
If you take short cuts your always gonna come up s
05:32 AM on 09/02/2011
You are so right !! That's exactly what happened. What a lousy deal that was. They might want to take a second look at what they did because it could affect the future of the sponsorship or charity of it all. The family holding the ticket took the shot and got it, it seems straight forward to me that they won it fair and square.
But on the other hand the father did teach his son's a great lesson in honesty even though it messed them up in getting the prize.
Who is ever going to sponsor an activity again where a winning shot means you really don't win !!
10:17 AM on 09/02/2011
Yeah, screw the rules as they were. There ought to be an "Identical Twin Rule" where one twin can substitute the other at their whim. Or better yet, have an open substitute law where anyone whose ticket is drawn can substitute a professional to take their place at a 50/50 split. Never mind that the tickets required a specific name of the person to take the shot. In fact require that insurance company to pay every ticket holder 50,000 to compensate for their disappointment at not being picked. Everybody should be able to own a palatial home too. Yeah Screw the people wo work for a living. Everybody should get a good solid middle class income even if they choose not to complete school and work for a living. Yeah. Sheesh!
photo
rafaelrobyns
micro-biotic
08:54 PM on 09/03/2011
Any activity potentially worth $50,000 paid by an insurance company comes with a legal contract. Duh.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ted Pierot
01:16 AM on 09/02/2011
give the kid the money!!! what a rip off and yes i read the article and its a bs reason so they don't have to pay...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
karela
01:15 AM on 09/02/2011
Since when are raffle tickets so loaded in legalities that another family member can't redeem them? Sounds like a scam to keep from paying to me. When I went to the art show, I bought a raffle ticket for a handmade quilt. I didn't expect to win but wanted to support the arts. I ended up winning and my friend loved the quilt much more than I did so I gave her the ticket. No one suggested that I'd broken the law. Goofy!
10:19 AM on 09/02/2011
You don't see the difference in a simple raffle and a skill contest?
photo
rafaelrobyns
micro-biotic
08:55 PM on 09/03/2011
You don't see the difference between a donated quilt and a $50,000 payoff backed by an insurance company?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AmySeow
01:11 AM on 09/02/2011
Ummm...how did 50 become 20?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kittykatluvr21
If you're not outraged,you're not paying attention
11:34 PM on 09/01/2011
Bull Sh**
05:17 PM on 09/01/2011
Who is going to pocket the other $30 Thousand? Hmmm