logo


Casey Anthony Could Have To Pay $500K Tab

Casey Anthony 500k

First Posted: 09/06/11 11:23 AM ET Updated: 11/06/11 05:12 AM ET

KYLE HIGHTOWER, Associated Press

ORLANDO, Fla. -- Casey Anthony's attorney said Friday that Florida authorities are trying to recoup the money spent investigating her 2-year-old daughter's disappearance only because of "sour grapes" over the woman's acquittal on a murder charge.

Judge Belvin Perry said after hearing arguments on the issue that he would not issue a ruling until at least Sept. 22. He could extend that date but said he hopes to rule by then.

Anthony was acquitted in July on charges of murdering her daughter, Caylee. But the 25-year-old was convicted of four counts of lying to authorities. She told officers a baby sitter had the child. Authorities later learned the baby sitter never existed, but the investigation drained manpower.

Anthony has appealed her convictions.

Several agencies, including the sheriff's office and Florida Department of Law Enforcement, filed expenses of more than $517,000.

Anthony was not in court Friday and is serving probation in an undisclosed location in Florida. After the hearing, defense attorney Cheney Mason said she was progressing well.

"She's fine," Mason said as he walked out of the courthouse. "She's getting help and she's being taken care of and protected. That's all I can tell you."

Asked about Anthony's financial outlook, Mason said that it is unchanged.

"I know of no deals with anybody and of nobody making any money," Mason said. "Casey has no money. She's indigent - period. So why are we doing this? Why are we wasting more and more taxpayers' money chasing a ghost?"

Mason called the state's attempt to make his client pay such high investigative costs unfair.

"What you have in essence is the state claiming 100 percent of the costs for a case they lost. ... That to me has nothing to do with justice. It has to do with sour grapes," he said.

Prosecutors spent the morning calling a handful of witnesses representing the four agencies seeking reimbursement. State attorney Linda Drane Burdick said though the totals seem high, all the costs arose from four lies Anthony was convicted of telling. - The sheriff's office has asked for $293,123; the state attorney's office has asked for $141,362; the FDLE is seeking $71,939; and the Metropolitan Bureau of Investigation is asking for $10,362.

She said it was unfair for taxpayers to cover those costs.

"But for Mrs. Anthony's lying at the beginning of this case, there would no investigative costs," Drane Burdick said. "... It would not have occurred if Mrs. Anthony had it in her to tell the truth."

The state is not seeking to get back money spent helping Anthony's defense or the money spent to sequester the jury during trial.

Anthony's lead defense attorney, Jose Baez, was not in court Friday.

Instead, Mason attacked the state's assertions, saying it was trying recoup all of its costs for the investigation and not just those related to what prosecutors say were Anthony's lies.

Mason pointed to dates well after the October 2008 murder indictment and December 2008 discovery of Caylee Anthony's remains that were included in the agency tallies. He also argued against court reporter invoices that didn't take place until 2010 and 2011, well after the investigative phase of the case.

"I think it's time (Florida state attorney) Lawson Lamar's office accepts the fact they lost this case," Mason said.

RELATED VIDEO:


Related Blog Posts

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 104
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Larsami1
JUST SAYING
11:23 PM on 09/07/2011
She said it was unfair for taxpayers to cover those costs.

Hmm. Let's see if CA was to pay back all the money they spent on her, will the tax payers get it back? So they'll keep all the tax payers money and CA's if she can pay it. I guess that's one way to make amends for doing such a lousy job of prosecution.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
The Lone Stranger
Yes, I am a lousy typist. OK!
01:26 PM on 09/07/2011
realistically she should have to pay whatever the costs were that resulted from her lying to the cops caused.

the problem is that she should not be charged the costs for prosecuting her for murder or investigating her for murder because she had no control over that.

I said it before and I will say it again, the defense won this case not because of a lack of evidence but because the horror of the crime itself was so great and the defense gave the jury an easy out that enabled them to pretend that no crime had been committed. The Prosecution failed to grasp this dynamic and so today a killer walks free.
12:41 PM on 09/07/2011
Here's the deal. The DA wants to get as large a cash judgement as possible. Casey A. may be indigent now but that is o.k. the DA will just put a lien againsed her for whatever the judge allows. If she gets a book deal the state's hand will already be in her pocket. If she remains poor and gets no book deal then she can't be forced to pay because it is a civil case not a criminal one. Smart move by the DA. Too bad they didn't put that much planning into her criminal case she might have been found guilty.
10:31 AM on 09/07/2011
Indigent? Are we supposed to feel pity for her?
Pay

Accused of killing her own flesh and blood and then she wouldn't take the stand to refute it? Does that sound like the choice of an innocent mother?. Pay.

Guilty or not in court, she created the whole drama. Pay

She played everybody, and if you think she shouldn't pay, she's playing you.

Hope her life is pure torment. Losing
09:36 AM on 09/07/2011
I think she should pay all the money back, I also think she should pay the lawyers fees back also, she should have gotten a court appointed lawyer like anyone who didn’t have any money.

We the tax payers foot the bills for her defense, and it is not fair.

I work hard for my money and pay my taxes only for it to be given to a lawyer to defend her, we are still dishing out money, know it is to protect her.

What makes her so important, that we continue to waste money on her, the money could be use for so many other things that needs doing in the state?

If this woman was black, all of this wouldn’t have been done for her, but she is white and that makes a big difference in this country right know.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mjune
06:38 AM on 09/07/2011
When you decide, as attorny Baez did, to use the defense that the victim was already dead before she was ever "missing," then you'd best start early to develop a plan to pay the costs. I think that neither Baez nor Mason thought their client would walk free. They and Casey's cash and limelight-loving parents anticipated they'd be in hot demand while she sat in jail for twenty years or so. Now their erstwhile and perpetually recycled client holds all the cards. Pay the bill.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mbazid
Just smile and nod
06:28 AM on 09/07/2011
Like it or not she was found to be not guilty.
Do you start making everyone pay costs just because you don't like the results of the trial?
I know that she most likely did it but thats not the point.
photo
dirtyliberal88
watch out, I teach your kids
10:16 AM on 09/07/2011
BUT she was found guilty of lying to police, that's what prolonged the investigation.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dfvboulder
05:23 AM on 09/07/2011
OK, she lied about the baby sitter, and cops were mislead. So make her pay for that disproving that lie. About $200 sounds right.

Get a clue.
11:55 PM on 09/06/2011
Casey Anthony lied about a lot of things. She lied about where her daughter was, she lied about who her daughter was with, and she lied about her employment. Her lies cost many companies and tax payers a lot of money and time searching for leads. If she didn't lie and try to blow smoke up so many asses then the time frame of the searches and the cost would have been lower. Her intent was to deceive and for that she should be made responsible and pay restitution for the mess she made with her lies. If she was honest and told the truth then yes I can see letting her off without paying, but to bold face lie and expect to get away without consequence is just ridiculous.
Searches aren't cheap..here is 1 link to a break down http://tinyurl.com/3rkdlj4
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
peegan
Silence like a cancer grows...S/G.
10:43 PM on 09/06/2011
Good luck collecting any money for this. Unless the state and county can show they routinely bill people for misleading an investigator, they will never see a dime. People lie to the police when they are under investigation, it goes with the territory. As much as I detest this woman, I have to agree with her attorneys. This seems like selective persecution. Just more waste of tax payer's money.
photo
babybecks
"because I am involved in Mankind;"
10:26 PM on 09/06/2011
She knew the baby was dead and sent everyone on a wild goose chase for an imaginary nanny, and a baby who she insisted was alive, when she knew all along the baby was dead. Who else should be responsible?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:35 PM on 09/06/2011
She should not have to pay for a court case she in essence won. I could see her having to pay the cost for the lying counts, but the full amount of the trial and the cost is ridiculous. I also think that if she pays this money that people will see her as paying off the state to be acquitted. I do not care about the money she is going to make off of "book and movie rights worth millions" (CosmicClassroom), it is the principle of the matter. In fact, this whole case was about principle. They could not find substantial evidence of her being the murderer so she was let go. In my opinion the justice system worked (even though I do believe that she most likely did it or was helped to cover it up).
photo
AdmireBucs
Love my Buccaneers
11:11 PM on 09/06/2011
Its lovely to have some common sense in any discussion regarding this woman, because you are right.....Principle is the heart of the matter...The prosecution failed.
07:21 AM on 09/07/2011
bwerd11, I agree with everything you said here except the Last sentence, I do not believe that she did it, helped cover it up? Possibly.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ComicClassroom
What's it all about, Alfie?
08:08 PM on 09/06/2011
She is being courted for book and movie rights worth millions. She needs to pay for all the costs of the investigation and trial. The money needs to go back to the county and state. This is taxpayer money -- your money and my money.
07:29 AM on 09/07/2011
If she has to pay anything, Nancy Grace should be required to pay at least half, she made a fortune on this case.
Besides, if every single person who was on trial, lied to the cops or not, and were found Not Guilty of any Capitol crime, had to pay for their trial expense, then I could understand what Florida is trying to do, however, this is not the case, she is being singled out because the prosecution had no case and lost, simple matter of sour grapes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ComicClassroom
What's it all about, Alfie?
09:31 AM on 09/07/2011
I kindly disagree. When a party such as Casey Anthony is in a position to make multiple, multiple, multiple millions of dollars off of a situation like this where there was blatant lying, manipulation, strategizing and egregious misuse of investigatorial, prosecutorial and judicial time, there must be a way for the County and State (taxpayer dollars) to reclaim monies (which, by the way, are close to a million dollars). There are a plethora of legal minds much more intelligent than myself who feel the same way as I do.
NoBlueDogs
FIGHT Offshoring!!!
06:00 PM on 09/06/2011
I think she's guilty and should have gotten the chair. But to make her pay for her prosecution? Woah. That sets a nasty precedent. Anthony haters should think about the repercussions of this. Seriously. If this gets put on her tab and others who get acquitted follow her in getting slapped with these bills, don't say I didn't warn y'all.
05:14 PM on 09/06/2011
Why should the state be allowed to collect money for a blotched up investigation? This gives them the liberty to investigate any and everything and leave the victim paying the bill.
What a preditory and a sore loser of a gov. we have.
She did not report the child missing and should not be charged for it.
I knew this investigation would go south as soon as the state chose to imprison someone without evidence.
Nope, their mistake and maybe the people involved should be fired like we would be if we messed up our jobs.