Green: PHOTOS: Tornado Aftermath Leaves Trail Of Destruction
KYLE HIGHTOWER, Associated Press
ORLANDO, Fla. -- Casey Anthony's attorney said Friday that Florida authorities are trying to recoup the money spent investigating her 2-year-old daughter's disappearance only because of "sour grapes" over the woman's acquittal on a murder charge.
Judge Belvin Perry said after hearing arguments on the issue that he would not issue a ruling until at least Sept. 22. He could extend that date but said he hopes to rule by then.
Anthony was acquitted in July on charges of murdering her daughter, Caylee. But the 25-year-old was convicted of four counts of lying to authorities. She told officers a baby sitter had the child. Authorities later learned the baby sitter never existed, but the investigation drained manpower.
Anthony has appealed her convictions.
Several agencies, including the sheriff's office and Florida Department of Law Enforcement, filed expenses of more than $517,000.
Anthony was not in court Friday and is serving probation in an undisclosed location in Florida. After the hearing, defense attorney Cheney Mason said she was progressing well.
"She's fine," Mason said as he walked out of the courthouse. "She's getting help and she's being taken care of and protected. That's all I can tell you."
Asked about Anthony's financial outlook, Mason said that it is unchanged.
"I know of no deals with anybody and of nobody making any money," Mason said. "Casey has no money. She's indigent - period. So why are we doing this? Why are we wasting more and more taxpayers' money chasing a ghost?"
Mason called the state's attempt to make his client pay such high investigative costs unfair.
"What you have in essence is the state claiming 100 percent of the costs for a case they lost. ... That to me has nothing to do with justice. It has to do with sour grapes," he said.
Prosecutors spent the morning calling a handful of witnesses representing the four agencies seeking reimbursement. State attorney Linda Drane Burdick said though the totals seem high, all the costs arose from four lies Anthony was convicted of telling. - The sheriff's office has asked for $293,123; the state attorney's office has asked for $141,362; the FDLE is seeking $71,939; and the Metropolitan Bureau of Investigation is asking for $10,362.
She said it was unfair for taxpayers to cover those costs.
"But for Mrs. Anthony's lying at the beginning of this case, there would no investigative costs," Drane Burdick said. "... It would not have occurred if Mrs. Anthony had it in her to tell the truth."
The state is not seeking to get back money spent helping Anthony's defense or the money spent to sequester the jury during trial.
Anthony's lead defense attorney, Jose Baez, was not in court Friday.
Instead, Mason attacked the state's assertions, saying it was trying recoup all of its costs for the investigation and not just those related to what prosecutors say were Anthony's lies.
Mason pointed to dates well after the October 2008 murder indictment and December 2008 discovery of Caylee Anthony's remains that were included in the agency tallies. He also argued against court reporter invoices that didn't take place until 2010 and 2011, well after the investigative phase of the case.
"I think it's time (Florida state attorney) Lawson Lamar's office accepts the fact they lost this case," Mason said.
RELATED VIDEO:
Hmm. Let's see if CA was to pay back all the money they spent on her, will the tax payers get it back? So they'll keep all the tax payers money and CA's if she can pay it. I guess that's one way to make amends for doing such a lousy job of prosecution.
the problem is that she should not be charged the costs for prosecuting her for murder or investigating her for murder because she had no control over that.
I said it before and I will say it again, the defense won this case not because of a lack of evidence but because the horror of the crime itself was so great and the defense gave the jury an easy out that enabled them to pretend that no crime had been committed. The Prosecution failed to grasp this dynamic and so today a killer walks free.
Pay
Accused of killing her own flesh and blood and then she wouldn't take the stand to refute it? Does that sound like the choice of an innocent mother?. Pay.
Guilty or not in court, she created the whole drama. Pay
She played everybody, and if you think she shouldn't pay, she's playing you.
Hope her life is pure torment. Losing
We the tax payers foot the bills for her defense, and it is not fair.
I work hard for my money and pay my taxes only for it to be given to a lawyer to defend her, we are still dishing out money, know it is to protect her.
What makes her so important, that we continue to waste money on her, the money could be use for so many other things that needs doing in the state?
If this woman was black, all of this wouldn’t have been done for her, but she is white and that makes a big difference in this country right know.
Do you start making everyone pay costs just because you don't like the results of the trial?
I know that she most likely did it but thats not the point.
Get a clue.
Searches aren't cheap..here is 1 link to a break down http://tinyurl.com/3rkdlj4
Besides, if every single person who was on trial, lied to the cops or not, and were found Not Guilty of any Capitol crime, had to pay for their trial expense, then I could understand what Florida is trying to do, however, this is not the case, she is being singled out because the prosecution had no case and lost, simple matter of sour grapes.
What a preditory and a sore loser of a gov. we have.
She did not report the child missing and should not be charged for it.
I knew this investigation would go south as soon as the state chose to imprison someone without evidence.
Nope, their mistake and maybe the people involved should be fired like we would be if we messed up our jobs.