Celebrity: Amy Adams' Bikini Body Isn't What You'd Expect ...
A 41-year-old Massachusetts mother is facing child endangerment charges after she allegedly forced her daughter to pose nude in front of a web camera.
Ann Lussier, of Attleboro, says that a man impersonating a Florida photographer used the Internet phone application Skype to dupe her into thinking she had entered a mother-daughter bikini contest with a $20,000 grand prize, according to the Attleboro Sun Chronicle.
Sitting in front of their computer, Lussier allegedly demanded her 10-year-old daughter to strip down to her bra and underwear before insisting she completely disrobe. The man on the other side of the camera, who police identified as Joshua Dunfee, of Oxford Junction, Iowa., hid his identity by teling Lussier that his web cam had broken.
"There are sickos out there, and they let them go. But I get locked up. I'm a victim," Lussier told the local newspaper.
Authorities arrested Lussier and Dunfee following a month-long investigation which began when the mother told her twin sister about how "uncooperative" her daughter behaved throughout the incident. The sister contacted police after hearing the young girl crying during the phone call.
"The intention the twin sister had was to report that someone, this pervert, was taking advantage of someone vulnerable and their goal was to get him," Lussier's lawyer, Ernest Solomon, told ABC News.
Lussier is charged with "exhibiting a child in a state of nudity, indecent assault and battery on a person under 14, and reckless endangerment of a child," according to NBC affiliate KSEE-4.
Dunfee will be sent to Massachusetts to face child pornography charges.
Why is it hard to believe some people are that caught up that they loose all common sense? I mean imagine how may people get duped into believe a check they won in some mysterious lottery is real and put the cash into the account and spend it before the check can actually cleared or without verifying the source thoroughly? Or people who thought they were getting a great deal on a vcr or dvd player and when they open the box at home, they find they have a wooden box.
For whatever reasons, some people do some of the silliest things for fame, wealth, or materialism, and sometimes their acts, while criminal my not be intended by their actions.
The minute she had her daughter strip she was not only putting her child on display, she was breaking the law and worse, “for gain.”
How do you have a computer these day and believe anything someone tells you, well enough asks you to take your child’s cloths off for them? When do the red flags go up for this person?
I understand very well how these professional criminals do their jobs. We were doped for $350,000. by a man who was to do a subdivision for us and he stole it. You have to trust the people running your project at some point while taking all the precautions you can, and we had meetings, a close life long friend overseeing, and top lawyers and still he did it. Costing us another million over 12 years before we could put it all behind us, so I know first hand how they work. Still I would have never put my son on display to pay for any of it.
I for one think that's more important than proper punctuation.
bud
http://www.hydroponicgrowrooms.com
http://www.hydroponicgrowrooms.com
This lawyer makes me sick. What about the child????? The mom should have protected her, not made her disrobe for some pervert!!!!!!!