logo


Michigan's Cherry Knoll Elementary School Under Fire For Removing 'Gay' From 'Deck The Halls'

Holly Berry

First Posted: 12/05/11 04:51 PM ET Updated: 12/06/11 10:49 AM ET

A Michigan music teacher's decision to censor the word "gay" from a traditional Christmas carol is being met with a frosty response.

The teacher, who has not yet been named in any of the published reports, allegedly removed "gay" from "Deck The Halls" after 1st and 2nd grade students kept giggling during preparations for a Christmas concert at Cherry Knoll Elementary School in Traverse City. Instead of the traditional lyric, the students were taught to sing "don we now our bright apparel," according to UpNorthLive.com.

The school's Facebook page has since been inundated with reactions from infuriated parents and fellow educators. "By taking the word 'gay' out of 'Deck The Halls' you are making it a big deal, one word can have different meanings," wrote one user. "Your personal opinions should not reflect what you teach other people's children. Please teach the children the classic song the way it was written." Another added: "Essentially, this teacher has now taught the elementary school children, including children as young as five, that gay means homosexual sex."

One user even incorporated a clever parody of the song's 19th century lyrics: "See the crazy school before us/Fa la la la la, la la la la/Prejudice with a thesaurus."

The story caught the eye of famed sex columnist Dan Savage, who noted, "Someone had to straighten out that carol--can't have children donning gay apparel."

As UpNorthLive.com notes, however, Principal Chris Parker has said he is disappointed in the music teacher's decision to change the lyrics to the song, and the students are, in fact, now back to singing the original version.


 
  • Comments
  • 29
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
09:43 PM on 12/06/2011
This is seriously ridiculous. She was just a woman trying to get a large group of kids to move on and stop giggling in a song. No wrong doing here. People need to get a grip!!!!!
09:32 PM on 12/06/2011
Ok, hysterical people. The teacher is not a homophobe. The kids kept giggling when singing the original word. She switched the word so they'd stop giggling. This is not a slam on gay people. Get off your high horses.
08:54 PM on 12/06/2011
"having or showing a merry, lively mood: gay spirits; gay music."
08:19 PM on 12/06/2011
LOL! The very uproar that she was trying to avoid is what she caused!!! Sometimes its best to leave well enough alone!! lol
06:58 PM on 12/06/2011
This article has very little information and people seem to be jumping to conclusions about the motives of the teacher. You have no idea what you would do if you were in the same situation. It is ONE word in ONE song and the meaning of the song remained the same. This should not even be an issue let alone a news article. Ridiculous. Teacher's just can't win anymore.
06:39 PM on 12/06/2011
Keep the word in the song. The word means to be happy, and has meant that LONG before the homosexual movement hijacked the word.
08:58 PM on 12/06/2011
It's depressing. Go look at dictionary.com. Gay as in merry is the #3 definition. You'll never guess what the 1st 2 are! :-(
06:29 PM on 12/06/2011
Seriously, aren't there more important issues?, If this PC continues they should also censor the old Flintstones reruns b/c I seem to remember they had a 'gay old time'
05:46 PM on 12/06/2011
The word gay no longer means happy or festive as noted by the children giggling. Times change, words change, and it didn't hurt anyone to change one word in the song. IMHO she did the right thing. Didn't change the meaning of the song at all.
05:38 PM on 12/06/2011
Really? F_A_G is the correct term when talking about a homosexual, not gay.
09:29 PM on 12/06/2011
Or "Jason".
09:34 PM on 12/06/2011
It's weird how so many gay men are named "Jason" or "Brandon". What's up with that?
04:34 PM on 12/06/2011
This is what happens when we start re-defining the meaning of words..."GAY" meaning happy, etc was around a whole lot longer than it's meaning for homosexuality. The music teacher should have taught her kids the true meaing of the word instead of removing it from the song. It's like the fact that there is always a measure 69 in music. Students giggle because they are thinking of the sexual conotation of the number...it used to bother me...but now I don't let it worry me. I just tell the students to grow up.
04:09 PM on 12/06/2011
There's nothing gay about homosexuals.
04:04 PM on 12/06/2011
To travelingsuper, I agree! A teacher should teach what is historically correct. For example, verse 4 from the Star Spangled Banner should also be taught:

O! thus be it ever, when freemen shall stand
Between their loved home and the war’s desolation.
Blest with vict’ry and peace, may the Heav’n rescued land
Praise the Power that hath made and preserved us a nation!
Then conquer we must, when our cause it is just,
And this be our motto: “In God is our trust;”
And the star-spangled banner in triumph shall wave
O’er the land of the free and the home of the brave!
04:00 PM on 12/06/2011
more pc bs from the same folks who have our schools ranked 20something in the world.
03:57 PM on 12/06/2011
how about teaching the children the correct meaning of gay as used in the song and not removing it:
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/gay
03:46 PM on 12/06/2011
I'm a music teacher. There's nothing wrong with using 'gay apparel'. It gives an opportunity to teach archaic uses. We're singing the traditional cultural tune where it's archaic meaning is 'happy' or 'joyful'. You elevate the children that way -- some words have different meanings, and they can change over time. In the end, the giggles won't last.

If you get "what does it mean now" with elementary school kids, then I would deflect it by noting that for different families it has different meanings -- ask your parents about it. I wouldn't touch answering that question in a classroom where the word 'homosexual' wasn't already an understood concept.

Yes, some kid is probably going to shout something. Deal with the disruption the same way you would with any shouting out and move back to task. Kids on task will focus on the task and forget the details of what just happened.

It appears in this article to be partly a classroom discipline issue -- change the word to avoid the hassle the kids are giving you. Not a best practice.

Anyone remember the first iteration of The Flintstones had "we'll have a gay old time" as the last lyric line of the theme song? This was in the 60s when I was young. By the 70s, the later versions of the series had "we'll have a great old time". So, the archaic usage was still commonly understood as contemporary definition by millions alive today.