logo


A Mitt Romney New Hampshire Win Means Obama Will Have To Fight For The State

Mitt Romney

First Posted: 01/10/12 04:38 PM ET Updated: 01/11/12 12:10 PM ET

MANCHESTER, N.H. -- In the days before the New Hampshire primary, the polling consultant for Mitt Romney's campaign, Neil Newhouse, conducted a series of three focus groups with independent New Hampshire voters.

The immediate aim was to understand Romney's appeal -- or lack of it -- among the crucial one-third of voters here: the ones who register "undeclared" and tend to be the last to decide, and therefore the most influential.

The intel was useful in the primary, but could also be of benefit if, as now seems at least likely, Romney is the GOP nominee.

Former Massachusetts Gov. Romney's vulnerability in the New Hampshire GOP primary -- his reputation as a "Massachusetts moderate" -- could become his strength if he is the standard-bearer, and could be critical in an effort to woo independent voters.

"He would give us a good shot here," said his New Hampshire campaign chairman, Tom Rath, a 30-year mainstay of Republican establishment politics in the state. "Voters here know his reputation from Massachusetts and he's practically a local. That's going to make it harder for the Democrats to attack him here."

Before the media caravan moves on, it is worth noting that New Hampshire and its four electoral votes will remain on the national radar screen. Especially if Romney wins the Republican nomination, this small but crucial swing state will be in play in the general election.

Even though President Barack Obama did not win the New Hampshire primary in 2008 -- a senator named Hillary Clinton did -- Obama, riding a wave of discontent about the economy and the Iraq war, won the Granite State by a nearly 10 percent margin against the GOP nominee and one-time New Hampshire favorite, Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.).

It is not clear that Obama could repeat that performance, or even get close.

Democrats think he can. Annie McLane Kuster, a popular Democrat who narrowly lost in a bid for Congress in 2010, is running again. The state's senior senator and former governor, Jeanne Shaheen, remains a force. "The president is going to hold New Hampshire, no problem," said Kuster, an early Obama backer in 2008.

But New Hampshire's Democratic Gov. John Lynch decided last fall not to seek reelection, and Kuster will now have to defend her good friend Obama, and not spend the campaign attacking the legacy of former President George W. Bush.

And while the unemployment rate in New Hampshire has remained comparatively low, anti-war sentiment is even stronger than before (this time focused on Afghanistan, Iran and elsewhere), and the economy is hardly booming, as evidenced by empty offices and storefronts along this old city's main thoroughfare, Elm Street. Like other states, New Hampshire is facing budget cuts and reductions in state services.

New England is now a Democratic presidential-election bastion, but if Romney is the nominee, the Republicans will have a chance to make a contest of it -- and force Obama to spend time and money -- both here and across the border in Massachusetts.

Even without the longtime personal ties -- the home on New Hampshire's Lake Winnipesaukee and so on -- Romney will have some room to reach out to independent voters here and counter Democratic efforts to portray him as a threatening figure. The political past he tried to obscure or explain away -- the one in which he worked with Democrats to pass all kinds of legislation in Boston -- could be a selling point, or at least a shield.

Obama and his team would have to worry about voters such as Mike Goulet, a roadside-repair truck driver who is registered "undeclared." He said that he voted for Barack Obama in 2008, but won't do so again.

"I think Obama did a pretty good job given the situation he was handed after 2008," Goulet said. "I mean, he deserves credit for helping to dig us out. It could have been worse. Also, he cut back the war in Iraq. I care a lot about that. I had buddies killed over there.

"But I think it's time for a change. I give Obama credit for what he did in the past, but now I think that he really isn't quite up to the job anymore. We need somebody new."

Goulet went on to say that he had decided to vote for Romney in the primary today. "He seems ok. He knows business. I want to put someone new in there, with some new ideas. So I guess I'm for Romney."

 
  • Comments
  • 4
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wrasmus306
Truth before rhetoric and I will listen...
10:22 PM on 01/11/2012
If you look back on the GOP debates, how much of the talk amongst all of the candidates is based on what is good for the American working stiff? They talk about tax breaks for the rich, cutting back on Social Security ( an "ENTITLEMENT?" that working folk have been PAYING for since long before the current crop of retirees were even born ), increased restrictions on women's health when it comes to contaception and abortion, as well as making a major issue of GLBT rights. None of them are even halfway serious talking about ways to improve the economy, increase jobs and manufacturing, foreign relations, etc. Some of them want to let the Reagan era "Trickle Down Economics" theory work its magik, but, as then, it won't work now. And, no one is more adamant on these issues than Mitt Romney.

What the GOTP rails about - equal rights for non-citizens, government paying for public services, is the way the Founding Fathers intended us to be over 230 years ago; they foresaw the coming of the GOTP and condemned it in their phrasing of the Constitution. They foresaw Mitt Romney as much as they foresaw George Wallace, and wrote against them. I think it is time for the voters of New Hampshire to be loyal to their Nation, not their neighbors.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sheilawmom
Texasyankee
06:01 PM on 01/11/2012
/romney is a large part of what Occupy wallstreet and the 99% of us is all about. I for the life of me can not believe that so many moderates and so called Republicans do not feel that it's wrong for those who are the richest, never had to suffer and have gotten tax breaks by buying companies and selling them for profit, then firing over 2000 workers who are unemployed because of Romney. After Romney's run for president in 2008, he went back to the private sector and bought and sold companies for profit; not working to promote jobs for American as he says. I think this information will all come out and in the long run, it will be the nails on his coffin in the next election...Huntsman is honest and hardworkig.....I trust him; even though I will vote for Obama
07:34 PM on 01/11/2012
Get a job! Get a life! If you want to live a better life, and stop "suffering" don't concern yourself with those who were smarter or worked harder. Or, move to a more Socialistic country.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lordgamble
ATWWWHG And They Wonder Why We Hate Gov't
09:29 PM on 01/11/2012
Let's see, Romney fired 2000 but Obama just announced firing 300,000 employees of the US military. So who fired more people?