logo


Sandra Triebel Could Be Charged With Involuntary Manslaughter For Drunk Teen's Fatal Accident

First Posted: 06/26/12 12:23 PM ET Updated: 06/27/12 01:39 PM ET

A Missouri judge is considering whether a party host can be held responsible for a drunk minor who left her home and caused a fatal car accident.

Sandra Triebel, 47, could face an involuntary manslaughter charge for the 2009 death of Laura B. Reynolds. The 16-year-old was killed on Halloween night when Kenneth S. Blake II, then 19, drove from Triebel's home with a blood alcohol level two-and-a-half times the legal limit and caused the deadly crash.

If the case goes to trial, Triebel could become the first person in state history to be convicted as an alcohol provider held responsible for a fatal drunk driving accident.

What makes this incident different?

ABC News reports:

[Jackson County Prosecutor Jean Baker] said her office charged Triebel in Reynolds' death because she mixed the drinks herself in her Kansas City home, knew that Blake was a minor when she served him alcohol, and knew that he was intoxicated when he got into his car. That level of criminal negligence warrants an involuntary manslaughter charge, she said.

Triebel’s defense lawyer, Tiffany Leuty, argues that her client can not be charged because it is impossible to prove that Triebel caused the accident, according to the Kansas City Star.

“We don’t hold people responsible for a third party’s actions,” Leuty said at a recent court hearing. “This is nothing new. People serve underage people all the time in Missouri, but we don’t have another person charged with involuntary manslaughter.”

If charged, Triebel also faces two misdemeanor counts of supplying liquor to a minor and allowing a minor to drink on her property.

Following the incident, Blake pleaded guilty to involuntary manslaughter and two counts of assault.

 
  • Comments
  • 30
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
10:52 PM on 07/02/2012
I'm a cashier at a gas station. In my state, if I sell alcohol to an already intoxicated person and that person gets into an accident, my store and I can be held civilly and criminally liable for any damages or injuries that occur. If I sell alcohol to a minor, I can face a felony charge with a fine between 2500 to 10000 dollars and jail time. That being said, I have no pity or sympathy with the host. She had to have bought the booze, she served it to a minor (maybe many minors), she allowed that same minor to drive away without attempting to restrain or even calling the cops to report him. She is responsible for the death that occurred. She should have gotten charged with murder.
10:03 PM on 07/02/2012
To address the replies to my earlier comment, I do blame the guy that killed the girl. He should pay the maximum penalty. But to say that this woman bears no responsibility in this girls death is just plain wrong. This woman served drinks to someone UNDER THE LEGAL DRINKING AGE, did nothing to prevent him from climbing behind the wheel, and as a result of HER actions as well as HIS, a teenage girl is dead. As far as the "kidnapping" therory, she should have thought about that before she got him wasted in her own home. When did we start giving irresponsible "adults" a pass when they do something incredibly stupid?
06:28 PM on 07/02/2012
Normally I would say she shouldn't be charged. But, mixing the drinks herself seems to have crossed a line.
04:02 PM on 07/02/2012
She should be in jail....since she mixed the drinks and provided the alcohol to a monro. Jail is a lot less than I would do if my child died as a result of her trying to be a "cool" mom.
02:07 PM on 07/02/2012
She mixed the drinks, allowed the kid to leave the house and now a young girl is dead. Don't give me grief about being able to die for your country and not be able to drink. I joined the Marine Corps at 17 and turned 19 in Saudi Arabia during the first Gulf War. I wonder how some of you would feel if it was your daughter that didn't make it home that night.
05:31 PM on 07/02/2012
If she had detained the "kid" from leaving, she could have been charged with kidnapping an adult. She had no authority over him, so should not be held responsible for his actions.
06:47 PM on 07/02/2012
I would be blaming the person who drank and drove
06:52 PM on 07/01/2012
She knowingly served alcohol to a minor and then let him leave when he was stone drunk. She should be charged with murder.
01:35 AM on 07/03/2012
He was not a minor, he was a 19 year old adult. 19 year's are adults in the eye of the law.
10:04 AM on 07/03/2012
That's ridiculous. A murder conviction requires intent and malice aforethought - none of which this woman demonstrated.
06:47 PM on 07/01/2012
Guilty. She knew what she was doing and allowed him to leave drunk. Screw involunatry, I'd call it murder, plain and simple.
10:08 AM on 07/03/2012
You can call it what you want but prosecutors know convictions generally require you charge people with appropriate charges (supported in law) or the defendant walks. Overcharge someone and they will likely walk without any convictions. Is that what you want to happen here Gary?
05:18 PM on 06/30/2012
As an accomplice to the crime but not of the actual crime itself. These are two distinct and individual crimes that led to the unfortunate demise of an innocent.
10:10 AM on 06/29/2012
No, but she can and should be charged with endangering the life of the driver. Also she can be sued in civil court for wrongful death. This won't put her in jail, but it WILL put her in the poor house
11:53 AM on 07/03/2012
Assuming that she loses the civil case - yes it could put her in the poor house. This is true.
04:48 PM on 06/28/2012
She did provide alcohol to someone under the drinking age, but she has no authority to detain an adult on her property to prevent him from driving. The most she could have done when he went to leave is to ask him not to drive and alert the police if he drove off anyway.
06:51 PM on 07/01/2012
But she didn't.
10:22 AM on 07/03/2012
There's no legal requirement that she ask him to not drive OR that she alert the police. The right thing to do? - sure. But this is not criminal activity.
05:08 PM on 07/02/2012
She shouldn't have provided minors alcohol, then she wouldn't have had the problem of stopping the drunk driver from driving.
05:59 PM on 07/02/2012
He was 19 and therefore and adult fully responsible for his own actions. The fact that he is under the drinking age is just that he is under the drinking age do he isn't allowed to have alcohol. But he was an adult pain and simple. His action was his own. It is sad that another uninvolved teenager got killed but that shouldn't justify prosecuting this women because we are angry and want more people to blame.
08:59 PM on 06/27/2012
they are still trying to blame someone for every accident unless it is a policeman or judge.
09:25 AM on 06/28/2012
She served the teen and allowed him to get in the car drunk. She broke the law by serving a minor, contributed to the death by allowing him in the car and should be punished.
10:41 PM on 06/28/2012
She did NOT serve a minor. She served an adult of 19 years who was too young to drink but old enough to vote AND to die serving his country in battle.
10:14 AM on 07/03/2012
That's ridiculous Susan. Yes - she admitted serving the underage person and should be cited for that (and it is a citation - AKA "a ticket" in most states).

It's alot harder to prove a case that she "contributed to the death" of someone by "allowing" the man (and he is 19 yrs old, therefore a grown adult in EVERY state) to drive away. The state is probably going to have an uphill battle to convict this woman of involuntary manslaughter. If that were the case the ownership and staff of every store, bar, restaurant, sporting event, concert, etc who served someone alcohol - and then that same person was subsequently involved in car crash with death could be facing criminal penalties - up to, and including manslaughter. I don't think alot of people would be okay with that.