logo


4 Billion Year Old, Extremely Valuable Meteorite Used As Doorstop By Tennessee Family (VIDEO)

The Huffington Post     First Posted: 10/21/12 EDT Updated: 10/22/12 EDT

The rock is nothing much to look at: 33 pounds and oval shaped. If you didn't know its history, you probably wouldn't be surprised that Donna Lewis's family used it as a doorstop, later parking it in the front garden.

It was even painted green for a time.

As it turned out, this was no ordinary rock. On Thursday, Donna and her husband George formally announced that the family rock picked out of a cow pasture in the 1930 is in fact a meteorite, Fox News reported.

Researchers from the University of Tennessee believe the ancient and very valuable rock came from a known meteorite strike that first turned up evidence in Tazewell, Tenn. in 1853.

According to Arizona State University's Center for Meteorite Studies, a meteorite is a solid body from outer space that has fallen to the Earth's surface. The Lewis meteorite is classified as a "find" by the center, since it was not observed falling to earth but rather was recognized after the fact by its distinct features.

George Lewis first started to suspect his rock might be special after running a metal detector over it in May. To his surprise, the detector's dial registered "overload," reports the Lexington Herald-Leader.

After confirming the rock's other worldly pedigree, Eastern Kentucky University purchased it, for eventual display in the school's new Science's building.

EKU's Department of Physics and Astronomy Chairman, Jerry Cook, says the meteorite will be at the Kentucky Academy of Science annual conference on campus Friday and Saturday, the Associated Press reported.

"We're extremely lucky to find something like this," Cook said, according to an EKU press release, " and to find one locally is a real plus for us." The rock is estimated to be more than 4 and a half billion years old.

In addition to being extremely rare, meteorites of this size are also valuable. In an October auction, cosmic rocks for sale had price tags ranging from the tens to hundreds of thousands of dollars, according to the Associated Press.

CORRECTION: An earlier draft of this version incorrectly stated the location of the Tazewell meteor strike. Tazewell is actually located in Tennessee.

 
  • Comments
  • 22
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
12:16 PM on 10/26/2012
For those who doubt the age verifying methods of the metorite, the carbon dating method, while not precise, is the best method available. And the amount of carbon 14 in a sample they know the amount that there is and the amount that is in the process of decaying and based on the known "half-life" of carbon 14 they can determine the age by taking the knowns and using them to determine the unknowns. For those throwing scripture around, get a life. If you happen to spot an inaccuracy in my statement please feel free to let me know.
03:27 PM on 10/25/2012
There is no way they can prove this thing is that old....no way.
07:59 PM on 10/25/2012
AMEN to that, they are so full of crap,
ALL dating methods have obvious flaws, most ppl just assume they are right

GOD BLess
03:45 PM on 10/24/2012
To comment on any of your "educations".......1 Cor. 1:27: But God hath chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise; and God hath chosen the weak things of the world to confound the things which are mighty;
04:35 PM on 10/24/2012
That scripture has nothing to do with meteorites.
12:44 AM on 10/25/2012
looser
07:13 AM on 10/24/2012
How do you date an extra terrestrial object at 4 billion years+. I mean what are you going to compare it to. I understand carbon dating but how are you going to know the level of carbon from some other planet has the same ammount of carbon 14 as related to an earth based object. I mean you can therorize it as old as the therotical age of the universe and the big bang theroy. But none of us were there to witness the events, and as its not from earth I don't see anyone getting distant planet samples to reference to with known ages.
02:03 PM on 10/24/2012
The truth is, you don't (probably as you already knew). These dates of origin are based upon assumption after assumption, and correlated to data from parallel studies, which in turn are
based upon their own assumptions, and so on.
03:52 PM on 10/24/2012
Carbon dating doesn't work for objects millions of years old. Carbon 14 has a half life near 5700 years. This means half of the carbon 14 has decayed into nitrogen 14 by losing a positron every 5700 years. For a million years, there would be (1/2)^(10000/57) times the original amount of carbon 14 left. That means there is only 1.540707e-51% of the original sample left. That means for a million trillion trillion trillion trillion pounds of the original sample you would only have 15 lbs left at the end of 1 million years. So as you can hopefully see, it's not possible to date objects that old using that method.

Normally meteorites are dated by the decay of rubidium 87 into strontium 87 which has a half-life of 49 Billion years. This means that much less of the rubidium is needed than the equivalent amount of carbon. The ratio of rubidium 87 to strontium 86 (the non-radioactive isotope) is also considered. You can read more about it here: http://www.meteoritestudies.com/protected_dating.htm

Unlike what geoh777 suggests, these methods are very robust and have been shown to be accurate and minimize the assumptions (Something geoh777 hasn't done in his own post).
08:11 PM on 10/25/2012
you can't possibly believe what you just said,
I want to know who watched the decay of rubidium 87 into strontium 87 for 49 billion years to know the half-life, so since nobody watched it that would mean they are assuming it decayed at the same rate for billions of years, thats why NO dating method works, too many assumptions
12:19 PM on 10/23/2012
4.5 billion year old rocks are not unusual. The earth is estimated to be 4.54 billion years old so it stands to reason there is a lot of stuff that age just laying around. Bedrock is maybe not so easy to get to but duhhh .... Another "researcher" trying to make the mundane and commonplace seems special and significant to keep getting taxpayer dollars to fund some meaningless study and conclusions.

http://pubs.usgs.gov/gip/geotime/age.html

I've got a Trilobite fossil estimated to be 600 million years old. The majority of all stuff is old stuff basically.
03:52 PM on 10/23/2012
I think you need to go back to school and read up more. The reason it is so unusual is that it is so old compared to the anything else around here. The rocks on earth have been changed over the billions of years therefore does not have the distinct qualities found in a rock that has been floating around for so long and not changed as much as the earth has changed things.

So duhh I would educate yourself some more then to say things that are uneducated. I think grade school kids are learning this same thing in school right now.
02:10 PM on 10/24/2012
Your education is not so complete, either.

The reason it is so unusual is because it is a meteorite and is not like the rocks in the area where it was found. This meteorite could have been formed from parent materials in a collision ten years before it hit the earth. No one could ever say for sure.
08:06 PM on 10/25/2012
you should educate yourself more aswell, NO dating method works period, so there is no way anyone could date anything, plus theres proof that the "so called " layers to the earth can't possibly be different ages, that just lacks common sense and certainly isn't scientific